Stories about 智能合约
1 related stories
Smart Contracts Claimed Vulnerable by the CVE Database, with Labels and Source Locations
AI InsightThis dataset directly links the CVE vulnerability database with Ethereum smart contract code, labels, and function-level locations, meaning the data foundation for smart contract security research is shifting from scattered reports to standardized resources. Yet its explicit non-validation of original claims shows the reliability issue of vulnerability knowledge bases persists, and researchers need to carefully distinguish between 'claims' and 'facts' when citing.Key TakeawaySmart contract security research is shifting from scattered CVE records to structured code-level datasets.Why It MattersSmart contract security research heavily depends on reliable vulnerability samples, yet past CVE records lacked uniform formats and code-level verification. This dataset provides a scaled, automated annotation resource that may accelerate training of vulnerability detection models and evaluation of audit tools, but unvalidated claims may also mislead those who rely on it.Who's Affected- Smart Contract Security ResearchersQuick access to structured vulnerable code and location info reduces data collection and cleaning costs.
- Smart Contract Audit Tool DevelopersDataset can train and evaluate detection models, but unvalidated claims may introduce noise.
- Ethereum Ecosystem ProjectsWidely adoption may improve audit coverage, but impact is indirect.
What's NextFollow whether the dataset is adopted as a training benchmark by mainstream vulnerability detection models, and the accuracy of its automated labeling and quality of its manual subset, to determine whether it becomes a long-term infrastructure or a short-term reference.Importance 58/100